Bill Wiggins believes a powerful antipsychotic medication helped save his wife, Kathye.
Helen Shields believes one of these drugs helped kill her mother, Helen Marciniszyn.
Two families, two drugs, two stories that capture the extremes of a debate about using these medicines to treat the diseases of aging when there are no other effective alternatives.
Kathye Wiggins took Johnson & Johnson's Risperdal. Marciniszyn took AstraZeneca's Seroquel. Both drugs are atypical antipsychotics, a category of psychotropic drugs that also includes Zyprexa from Eli Lilly & Co., Abilify by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., and Pfizer Inc.'s Geodon.
The federal government approved atypicals in the 1990s to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Since then, they have become popular for treating disorders including autism and Alzheimer's, despite mixed evidence that they help and ample evidence that they hurt.
Doctors prescribe atypicals for these illnesses because they may calm people and help them sleep. Also, patients with Alzheimer's and dementia can lose touch with reality, as schizophrenics do, so, in theory, atypicals could help.
Sales of atypicals rose to $14.36 billion in 2008 from $8.4 billion in 2003, according to data provider IMS Health.
Elderly patients have been a major source of that growth. Studies suggest that 20 percent to 30 percent of nursing-home residents take an atypical, despite not having a psychosis diagnosis.
READ MORE @ PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER
Showing posts with label Antipsychotics use. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Antipsychotics use. Show all posts
Friday, July 10, 2009
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Antipsychotics in Children: Experts Report Mixed Results
Studies of antipsychotics in child prenpresented at the 48th Annual New Clinical Drugs Evaluation Unit (NCDEU) Meeting, conducted by the NIMH in Phoenix, May 27-30, provide some data where there have been relatively little on the increasing use of these agents.
In a panel discussion on ethics applications in child and adolescent psychopharmacology research and practice, panel chair Christopher Kratochvil, MD, University of Nebraska, noted, “while children have additional protections as a vulnerable population in research, recognition of underserved treatment needs is driving demand for psychopharmacology progress.”
As psychopharmacotherapy in children may be expanding faster than its evidence base, however, there is also increasing concern that risk-benefit is not being adequately assessed. In the October issue of the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, a retrospective cohort study of antipsychotic use in children and adolescents reveals that these agents are associated with increased risk of adverse metabolic and cardiovascular events.[1] Neurological adverse events in this cohort were reported separately in the Journal of Child Neurology.[2]
READ MORE @ PSYCHIATRIC TIMES
In a panel discussion on ethics applications in child and adolescent psychopharmacology research and practice, panel chair Christopher Kratochvil, MD, University of Nebraska, noted, “while children have additional protections as a vulnerable population in research, recognition of underserved treatment needs is driving demand for psychopharmacology progress.”
As psychopharmacotherapy in children may be expanding faster than its evidence base, however, there is also increasing concern that risk-benefit is not being adequately assessed. In the October issue of the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, a retrospective cohort study of antipsychotic use in children and adolescents reveals that these agents are associated with increased risk of adverse metabolic and cardiovascular events.[1] Neurological adverse events in this cohort were reported separately in the Journal of Child Neurology.[2]
READ MORE @ PSYCHIATRIC TIMES
Labels:
Antipsychotics use,
children,
efficacy,
safety
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)